Who may conduct a property auction in Singapore, and under what rules

In this article

Written by

Kooky

Builder of Shaka, the payment router that pays every agent their commission on closing date.

About Kooky and Shaka →

The person on the rostrum at a Singapore property auction takes bids worth millions of dollars, decides which bid stands and brings down the hammer on a binding contract. A seller or a bidder might fairly assume that the role comes with a licence. For most of the twentieth century it did. Since 1 August 2000, on the texts read for this guide, it has not, and the statute that used to license auctioneers now licenses valuers only, under a different name.

This guide describes the position as read in October 2026. It follows the auctioneer's licence from the ordinance of 1906 to its abolition, using the texts on Singapore Statutes Online. It then sets out what the Estate Agents Act 2010 says about auctions and auctioneers, how the Singapore Courts choose the auctioneers who sell seized property, how the auction desks of the property consultancies present themselves, and what a seller or a bidder can verify. It closes with the points the sources read do not settle.

Appraisers Act 1906, legislative history, and Auctioneers' Licences (Fees) Order, 1998 Revised Edition, on Singapore Statutes Online; Singapore Courts, page on the Sheriff's services for immovable property, last updated 24 July 2026.

A licence that began in 1906

The legislative history printed with the current Act on Singapore Statutes Online starts with Ordinance X of 1906, the Auctioneers Licensing Ordinance 1906. It was read a first time on 16 March 1906 and came into force on 1 July 1906. The history then lists 21 entries in all, among them revised editions of 1920, 1926, 1936, 1955, 1970 and 1985. By the 1970 edition the law was called the Auctioneers' Licences Act.

The 1985 Revised Edition, still published on Singapore Statutes Online as a historical version, shows what the law looked like in its last years. Its long title describes it as an Act to provide for the licensing of auctioneers, appraisers and house agents. One statute covered three trades: the person who sells by bidding, the person who values, and the person who finds a buyer or a tenant.

Section 2 of that edition defined the auctioneer by what the person did, not by a title. Anyone who carried on an auction business, acted as an auctioneer at a sale, or sold goods or land at a competitive sale in which the highest bidder became the buyer was deemed to carry on the trade or business of an auctioneer. Land was named in the definition, so a property auction fell squarely within it. Section 3 then required an auctioneer to take out a licence, in a form set out in the Schedule, before conducting any auction.

What the old licence asked of an auctioneer

The licence was issued by a tax official. Section 17(1) of the 1985 edition gave the power to grant licences to the Comptroller of Property Tax. The Auctioneers' Licences (Fees) Order, in its 1998 Revised Edition, set the fees payable to the Comptroller for the grant or renewal of each licence: S$150 for an auctioneer's licence, S$125 for an appraiser's licence and S$130 for a house agent's licence. The page read does not say what period a fee covered.

The Act also reached into the auction room. Under section 11(1) of the 1985 edition, before a sale began the auctioneer had to put up a ticket or board showing, in the Act's words, his "true and full name and residence", in large and legible letters, in a conspicuous place, and keep it there for the whole auction. A bidder could see who was selling without asking.

Three other provisions show how the licence was meant to work:

• Cancellation. Section 14 let the licensing officer refuse or cancel a licence where the holder had been convicted under the Act, had failed to account for or pay over money or property, or had misconducted himself as an auctioneer.
• Other licences. Section 12 said that an auctioneer's licence did not excuse its holder from any further licence the law required for selling particular goods by auction.
• Rules for sales. Section 18(1) let the Minister make regulations for public auction sales and against collusive or fraudulent sales, including the notice and advertising of sales ordered by mortgagees or trustees.

The edition also carried a section headed as an exemption for officers of courts in levies not exceeding S$100, and section 16 sent offences under the Act to a District Court. The page read did not give the penalty amounts, so this guide does not state them.

August 2000: the licence is abolished

The change came in one short amending statute. The legislative history records it as Act 22 of 2000, the Auctioneers' Licences (Amendment) Act 2000, introduced as Bill 17 of 2000. It had its first reading on 22 May 2000 and its second and third readings on 3 July 2000, and it came into force on 1 August 2000. From the first reading to commencement took 71 days.

The text of the amending Act could not be opened for this guide. What it did is taken from two sources. The legislative history says that the Auctioneers' Licences Act was renamed the Appraisers and House Agents Act by Act 22 of 2000, with effect from 1 August 2000. And a legislation update published at the time on the website of the Singapore Law Gazette, credited to a lawyer at Allen and Gledhill, summarises its purposes. According to that update, the Act abolishes the licensing of persons carrying on the trade or business of auctioneer, without affecting regulation under other laws, of which it names the Wholesome Meat and Fish Act 1999 and the Pawnbrokers Act as examples.

The same update describes a transitional rule. Auctioneers who already held a licence were deemed to be licensed appraisers and licensed house agents until 31 December 2000, so that they did not have to apply for new licences at once. From 1 August to 31 December 2000 is five months. The update also lists consequential amendments to four other statutes: the Arms and Explosives Act, the Central Provident Fund Act, the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore Act and the Trustees Act.

Neither source gives the reason Parliament abolished the licence. No ministerial speech was read for this guide, and the reason is left open here.

What is left of the Act today

The statute survived by shedding trades. The Estate Agents Act 2010, which the legislative history lists as Act 25 of 2010 with second and third readings on 15 September 2010, came into force on 22 October 2010 and renamed the Act a second time, to the Appraisers Act. The current edition marks two sections as repealed by that Act. The Statute Law Reform Act 2021, in force on 1 March 2021, repealed two more.

The current text is the 2020 Revised Edition, which Singapore Statutes Online describes as incorporating all amendments up to 1 December 2021 and coming into operation on 31 December 2021. Its long title is now a single line: an Act to provide for the licensing of appraisers. Section 4 says every appraiser must take out a licence. Section 2 treats as an appraiser a person who values immovable property, or an interest in it, for or in expectation of a fee or reward. Section 6 keeps the licensing power with the Comptroller of Property Tax, and section 7(3) sets a fine of up to S$2,000 for carrying on a licensable business without a licence or failing to renew one.

On the reading of the current Act made for this guide, neither the word "auction" nor the word "auctioneer" appears anywhere in its provisions. They survive only in the legislative history, in the former titles of the Act and of the ordinances that amended it.

Where the Estate Agents Act stops

The Estate Agents Act 2010 is the statute that regulates the property trade in Singapore, through the Council for Estate Agencies. It could have taken the auctioneer in. Its definitions leave the auctioneer out, in two places.

Section 3(1) defines estate agency work broadly. It is work done for a client, in the course of a business or for a fee, that consists of introducing a third person who wishes to acquire or dispose of a property, negotiating the acquisition or disposition, or work done after that introduction in relation to it. An estate agent is a person who does that work, and a salesperson is an individual who does it while employed or engaged by an estate agent, or as its director or partner.

Section 3(3) then narrows the definition. Under paragraph (a), estate agency work does not include, in the Act's words, "work which relates solely to a survey, to a valuation or to a disposition by way of auction or tender". Under paragraph (b), a reference to an estate agent does not include an auctioneer whose function is solely to conduct an auction. Both paragraphs read the same in the 2020 Revised Edition on Singapore Statutes Online and in the informal consolidation that the Council for Estate Agencies publishes for the version in force from 1 July 2025.

Section 4(1) adds a list of people the Act does not apply to at all. It includes executors, trustees, liquidators and receivers acting in that capacity, licensed appraisers when they are valuing, persons dealing with a mortgage or charge over property, and vendors or purchasers dealing with their own property. A receiver acting in that capacity, or an owner selling its own property, is therefore outside the Act for its own part in the sale.

Put together, the position on the texts read is this. No statute read for this guide requires a person to hold a licence in order to conduct a property auction in Singapore. The licence that existed was abolished in 2000, and the Act that regulates property agents excludes the person whose only function is to conduct the auction.

The word that does the work is "solely"

Both exclusions in section 3(3) turn on one word. The work must relate solely to a disposition by auction. The auctioneer's function must be solely to conduct an auction. The Act does not say that anyone who works at an auction desk is outside it.

That matters because auction desks, on their own description, do more than hold auctions. Knight Frank Singapore's auctions page, which carries a metadata date of 26 May 2026, presents private treaty as a separate option that lets a seller negotiate price, timing and terms directly with potential buyers. PropNex's auction page, when it was read for this guide, showed three properties, one labelled as an auction sale and two labelled as private treaty. And EdgeProp Singapore, in a report of 3 February 2025, quoted Sharon Lee, then described as Knight Frank's head of auction and sales, as saying that "the bid-ask gap is often resolved with transactions that are concluded after the auction by private treaty".

Introducing a buyer to a seller and negotiating a sale are the activities that section 3(1) calls estate agency work. Whether a particular sale agreed after an auction is estate agency work depends on what was done and by whom. The pages read do not say who at each firm handles private treaty sales, or under what licence or registration, and nothing in them suggests a breach by anyone. This guide does not classify any firm's sales or staff. What the Act makes clear is what follows when work is estate agency work.

Under section 28, as set out in the Council's consolidation, a person may not do estate agency work as an estate agent, or advertise or hold out as willing to do it, without being a licensed estate agent. The maximum penalty is a fine of S$75,000, imprisonment for three years, or both, with a further fine of up to S$7,500 for each day the offence continues after conviction. Under section 29, a person may not act as a salesperson for a licensed estate agent without being registered, on pain of a fine of up to S$25,000, imprisonment for up to 12 months, or both. Sections 28(3) and 29(4) add a commercial sanction: no fee, commission or reward for anything done in respect of the offence can be recovered in any action.

A worked example shows the scale of the ceilings and nothing more. Assume a hypothetical unlicensed business, not any firm named in this guide, is convicted under section 28 and carries on for ten further days. The statute would allow a fine of up to S$75,000 for the offence and up to S$7,500 for each of the ten days, which is S$75,000 more, so a ceiling of S$150,000 in fines. Courts fix actual sentences case by case; the figures are the maximums in the Act.

The one list of auctioneers the state keeps

There is one place where a public body in Singapore chooses who may auction property, and it is the court. When immovable property is seized to pay a judgment debt, the Singapore Courts' page on the Sheriff's services for immovable property, last updated on 24 July 2026, says the auction must be conducted by an "authorised auctioneer" unless the Sheriff or the bailiffs order otherwise. The page does not define the term, and it mentions no licence.

For Supreme Court cases the page sets out a panel instead. According to the page, the Supreme Court invited suitably qualified auctioneer service providers to apply on 3 August 2022, and the panel was constituted on 24 October 2022, which is 82 days later. It has three members, all companies: Edmund Tie and Company (SEA), ERA Realty Network and Knight Frank. The page notes that the names are arranged alphabetically and in no order of preference. It does not describe how or when the panel is reviewed.

The page describes the appointment in steps. The party asking for the sale, or its lawyer, selects an auctioneer from the panel and informs the Sheriff's Office through the courts' electronic filing system. The Sheriff's Office may accept or reject the selection. If it accepts, the auctioneer must be contacted and appointed at least 7 days or 3 weeks before the auction date, whichever the appointment letter requires. The sale is advertised publicly by the Sheriff or the auctioneer 14 days before it takes place.

Each auctioneer on the panel lists the same fee, 1 per cent of the sale price. On an illustrative sale at S$1,800,000, that is S$18,000. For State Courts cases the page gives no percentage: the auctioneer collects from the party a fee it considers sufficient to cover its fees and expenses.

The court also keeps a second panel, of appraisers, with four companies: Colliers International Consultancy and Valuation (Singapore), Jones Lang LaSalle Property Consultants, Knight Frank, and Robert Khan and Co. The page states that the appraiser and the auctioneer selected for a sale must not be from the same company. One firm appears on both panels, so in a sale where it values, another firm must hold the auction, and the reverse.

How the auction desks describe themselves

The firm pages read describe their auction staff by job title. Knight Frank Singapore's auctions page lists a managing director for corporate affairs who is also head of auction and sales, and says its auctions are conducted live with an auctioneer and streamed online at the same time. The page says the firm holds real estate auctions and chattel auctions, the second covering motor vehicles, electronic gadgets and other movable assets. It does not name the auctioneer for a given sale or describe that person's training.

EdgeProp Singapore's report of 28 July 2026 on auction listings in the first half of the year quoted the head of auction and sales at ETC, which it described as a member of Realion Group. PropNex's auction page listed properties and no staff. None of the firm pages read for this guide states whether the people on its auction desk are registered salespersons, and none refers to an auctioneer's licence, which is consistent with there being none to refer to.

The sellers behind the lots are more varied than the word auction suggests. Knight Frank's catalogue for its auction of 22 October 2026, in a file dated 8 October 2026, held 27 entries. By their labels, 9 were owner's sales, 7 were mortgagee sales, 9 were marked simply as auction sales, 1 was a Sheriff's sale and 1 a public trustee sale. That adds up to 27. The auctioneer's instructions come from a different kind of seller in each case, and so does the rule book around the sale: section 24(1)(a) of the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act 1886, for instance, lets a mortgagee sell by public auction or by private contract on the conditions it thinks fit.

What a seller or bidder can check

No register of auctioneers was found in the sources read, and no statute read for this guide provides for one. Four things can still be checked from public sources, and each answers a different question.

1. Whether the firm is a licensed estate agent and the individual a registered salesperson. Section 36 of the Estate Agents Act requires the Council for Estate Agencies to keep a register and make it available for public search. The Council's consumer page, last updated on 4 September 2026, says the public register shows whether a registration is valid, the residential transactions an agent facilitated in the last two years and which parties the agent represented, awards, and any disciplinary records, with the agency's name and licence number. The page describes a search by phone number and gives a registration number in the form R123456A as its example.
2. Whether a valuation was made by a licensed appraiser. The Appraisers Act 1906 requires a licence for valuing property for a fee, and section 6 says the issue of a licence is notified in the Gazette.
3. In a court sale, whether the auction house is on the court's panel. The three names are on the Singapore Courts' page, with the rule that the auctioneer and the appraiser come from different companies.
4. What the conditions of sale let the auctioneer decide. In the Sheriff's sale of 22 January 2025 whose conditions the courts published, the auctioneers fixed the bid increment, could refuse a bid and had the final word on a disputed bid. Those powers came from the contract, not from a statute.

The first check has a limit that follows from section 3(3). A person whose function is solely to conduct the auction is not an estate agent under the Act, so the absence of that person from the register does not, of itself, show a breach. The Council's page says that a phone number leading to no profile is not registered with the Council; the page is written about property agents and does not mention auctions or auctioneers.

The auctioneer's licence was abolished in 2000. What a bidder can verify today is the firm, the valuer, the court's panel and the conditions of sale.

What the sources leave open

Several points could not be settled from the pages read, and they are named here so that nothing above is taken further than its source.

• The reason for abolition. The amending Act of 2000 and the parliamentary debate on it were not read. The Law Gazette's update describes what the Act did and gives no reason.
• Auction provisions in the conveyancing statute. Any sections of the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act 1886 dealing specifically with reserve prices or a seller's right to bid could not be opened. Only the mortgagee's power in section 24 is reported.
• The old penalties. What an unlicensed auctioneer risked before August 2000, and how long the S$150 licence ran, are not on the pages read.
• "Authorised auctioneer". The courts' page uses the term without defining it, and gives no criteria for joining the panel beyond the 2022 invitation to suitably qualified providers.
• Other laws. The Law Gazette's update says regulation of auctions under other statutes was unaffected and names two that deal with goods. Whether any other law touches the sale of land by auction was not verified.
• Section numbers. The 1985 edition and the 2020 edition number their sections differently. Each reference above belongs to the edition named with it.

Kooky, from Shaka

Kooky edits Agents Estate and builds Shaka, the payment router he made for real estate professionals. One payment comes in, and every agent, agency and party in the deal receives their signed share on closing date.

About Kooky and Shaka →