In this article
Kooky
Builder of Shaka, the payment router that pays every agent their commission on closing date.
About Kooky and Shaka →The United States Treasury has taken its first formal step towards writing the rules for the federal ban on large investors buying single-family homes. The federal government's register of regulatory reviews shows that a proposed rule from the Treasury's Departmental Offices was received for White House review on Friday 2 October 2026, and Bloomberg Government reported on Monday 5 October that the review was still under way.
The text of the rule is not public. What is public is its title, "Implementing the 21st Century Road to Housing Act's Ban on Large Institutional Investor Purchases of Single-Family Homes; Part 1", its reference number, RIN 1505-AC96, and its stage: a proposed rule, which is a draft and not a final text. Bloomberg Government reports that the Treasury will propose the rule once the review is complete. The ban itself is already law and is due to start on 7 January 2027, according to a summary of the statute by the law firm Holland & Knight.
Threshold, effective date and penalty as summarised by Holland & Knight in an alert dated 25 August 2026; the text of Section 1001 itself was not read for this article.
What the review record shows
The entry on the regulatory review register is short, and most of what it says is procedural. The agency is listed as the Treasury's Departmental Offices. The stage is "Proposed Rule". The date received is 2 October 2026. The field for a legal deadline reads "None", and the field asking whether the rule is economically significant reads "No". The record shows no date on which the review ended.
Two things follow from those fields, and both are modest. First, nothing in the record obliges the Treasury to publish by a given day. Second, the words "Part 1" in the title suggest that at least one more instalment is planned. That is a reading of the title only: the Treasury has not said so in any document seen for this article, and the record does not describe what the first part covers.
Related readDubai's listed property REITs: what they own, pay out and reportThe rule's content is unknown until the Treasury proposes it
The review record gives a title, a number and a date. It does not say which definitions, exceptions or procedures the first part addresses. Everything in this article about what investors may and may not buy comes from the statute as summarised by others, not from the rule.
Bloomberg Government's report, by Erin Schilling, adds the political setting. It describes the restrictions as part of a bipartisan housing package passed over the summer, supported by Democrats and by President Donald Trump. It also notes a point that matters to the rental industry: the law does not stop institutional investors from building or buying new single-family rental homes, a feature that housing advocates welcomed, according to the report.
The law the rule will implement
The statute is the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, Public Law 119-101. The published text of the law, on the Government Publishing Office's site, gives its approval date as 11 July 2026 and its origin as the House bill H.R. 6644. The ban sits in Section 1001, under the heading "Homes are for people, not corporations", in Title X, which is headed "Home-Ownership for Main Street America". Those headings and dates were read on the public law itself. The detailed provisions below were not: they are taken from Holland & Knight's alert of 25 August 2026, written by Christopher M. Jaarda, and from an earlier summary by the law firm Morgan Lewis dated 7 July 2026.
On how the Act became law, the sources describe the same event from different sides. Morgan Lewis records that Congress passed the Act on 23 June 2026 and that it was presented to the president on 29 June. Holland & Knight writes that it became law on 11 July after the president declined to act on it. Bloomberg Government describes the restrictions as backed by the president.
Related readS&P expects Dubai housing supply to rise 20% over two yearsThe core of Section 1001, as both firms read it, is one definition and one prohibition. A "large institutional investor" is a for-profit entity, such as a fund, a corporation, a partnership or a limited liability company, that invests in, owns, rents or manages single-family homes and has investment control, alone or with others, over at least 350 of them. Government bodies are excluded. A covered investor may not purchase a single-family home, or enter directly or indirectly into a contract to purchase one. According to Holland & Knight, "purchase" covers any acquisition or transfer, including through a merger, a bulk purchase, construction or foreclosure, whether or not cash changes hands.
Two definitions widen the reach beyond what the headline number suggests. A single-family home, in the summaries of the Act, is a structure with two or fewer dwelling units, so a duplex counts; manufactured homes are excluded. And investment control is not limited to the name on the deed. Holland & Knight lists five routes: owning the home or holding primary authority over investment or management decisions; being or controlling the general partner or managing member of the owner; being or controlling its investment manager or adviser; holding more than 25% of any class of equity in the owner, unless as a passive investor; or otherwise controlling the owner.
What investors may still buy
The ban is forward-looking. Holland & Knight states that the enacted text contains no requirement to sell: homes owned before the law are kept, and restructurings of existing portfolios are not treated as purchases. An earlier Senate version, the firm notes, would have required certain homes to be sold to individual buyers within seven years; that requirement did not survive.
Related readSingapore state land for homes costs 58% more than in 2016: EdgePropThe firm counts eleven categories of excepted purchase. The table sets out the ones that shape day-to-day business.
| Exception | What it covers | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Build-to-rent | Newly built homes kept and managed as rentals | Followed by long-term rental management |
| Renovate-to-rent | Homes below local code that are substantially rehabilitated | Improvements of at least 15% of the purchase price |
| Built or renovated for sale | Homes built, renovated or converted, then sold | Intended for sale |
| Debt and loss mitigation | Debt satisfaction, repossession, loan servicing | Not a long-term holding strategy |
| From another large investor | Homes the seller owned at enactment or bought lawfully since | None stated |
| From smaller investors | Homes sold by investors outside the definition | Until 7 January 2029 only |
| Senior communities | Homes for households with a member aged 55 or over | Visitability standards set by HUD |
Source: Holland & Knight alert, 25 August 2026. Seven of the eleven categories the firm lists are shown; two homeownership-programme exceptions and a combination category are described in the text.
Two further exceptions concern routes to ownership for tenants. One covers a homeownership programme with four statutory requirements, of which the alert details one: the arrangement must be a consumer credit transaction secured by a dwelling. The other covers programmes sponsored by the investor that report participating renters' payments to credit reporting agencies and give the tenant a right of first refusal with a 30-day first look; financial help towards a purchase is allowed under that route but not required. The last category lets an investor combine the others in a single transaction, including for a community planned and financed as one rental project.
Homes bought under an exception after enactment do not count towards the 350, Holland & Knight adds. An investor near the line does not cross it by building rental houses.
Dates, notices and penalties
The prohibition takes effect 180 days after enactment, Holland & Knight says, which from 11 July 2026 gives 7 January 2027. On the day this article is published, that is 89 days away.
- 29 June 2026The Act is presented to the president, six days after Congress passed it.
- 11 July 2026Public Law 119-101 takes its approval date. The 180-day clock starts.
- 2 October 2026The Treasury's first proposed rule is received for White House review.
- 7 January 2027The purchase ban takes effect. First status notices to HUD are due by about this date.
- 7 January 2029The window for buying from smaller investors closes.
The same 180-day period governs two duties that fall outside the Treasury's rule, in Holland & Knight's account. Each covered entity must tell the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) whether it is a large institutional investor, and if so how many single-family homes it controls, by city and state; cities where it holds ten homes or fewer need not be listed. The notice is then repeated by 31 December each year. HUD, for its part, must open a toll-free number and a public website where tenants of homes owned by large investors can report disputes. Investors must give each tenant written notice of that service at move-in and once a year, and name who handles disputes on their side.
Related readSingapore: IOI Properties to buy Shenton House from its own chiefEnforcement, the alert says, is by civil action, brought by the Treasury Secretary or, at the Secretary's request, by the Attorney General. Holland & Knight describes the action as discretionary. The penalty is up to US$1,000,000 per violation or three times the purchase price of the home, whichever is greater. On a home bought for US$500,000, to take an illustrative figure, three times the price is US$1.5 million, so that is the ceiling; on a cheaper home the US$1,000,000 figure applies.
How long the ban lasts is the one point on which the summary is not clear. Holland & Knight says the prohibition and its enforcement provisions expire after 15 years and gives the repeal date as 11 July 2041, which is 15 years after enactment and not 15 years after the effective date. The text of the section would settle it and should be checked before relying on either date.
What the Treasury is allowed to decide
The rule under review rests on a specific grant of authority. As Holland & Knight and Morgan Lewis both describe it, the Treasury Secretary may issue regulations to carry out the section after consulting HUD, the Federal Housing Finance Agency and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Morgan Lewis adds that the Secretary must consider how to limit market disruption and has only limited power to alter the key definitions and thresholds. Holland & Knight phrases the purposes as minimising disruption where a material risk to the housing market is identified, and mitigating harm to consumers and communities. The alert gives no deadline for regulations, which matches the "None" on the review record.
Related readSingapore: Jalan Merbok site offered for senior living, bids by 6 NovemberThe same alert points to gaps the statute leaves. The renovate-to-rent exception depends on "substantial rehabilitation", which the Act does not define. The broad control tests raise the question of how homes are counted when several vehicles share a manager or a general partner. Whether "Part 1" addresses those points is not known.
What it means on each side of a sale
For an owner-occupier, the practical content of the law is narrow and concrete. On the law firms' reading, from 7 January 2027 a company controlling 350 or more single-family homes cannot, as a rule, be the buyer of an existing house in ordinary condition from a household. It can still build, buy new rental homes, rehabilitate houses that fail local codes, and take properties through foreclosure. Investors below the line are not covered at all.
For the investors concerned, the Act leaves existing portfolios intact and channels new money towards construction and rehabilitation. The proposed rule is their first chance to see how the Treasury reads the definitions that decide who is covered.
The size of the group is small in the sales data. Inman reported on 5 October 2026, from an analysis by the data firm Cotality, that owners of 1,000 or more homes bought 2.2% of single-family homes sold in August 2026, up from a low of 1.4% in February. Cotality's category starts well above the Act's 350-home line, so the figure does not measure every covered buyer.
For agents and closing professionals, the question the law adds to a transaction is who the buyer is and which exception, if any, it relies on. The penalty falls on the investor, according to the summaries, and none of the sources describes a new duty for brokers.
What comes next
The next dated event is the end of the White House review, after which the Treasury is expected to propose the rule, Bloomberg Government reports. No date has been announced.
Other parts of the Act are moving on separate tracks. The trade publication The Title Report wrote on 8 October 2026 that HUD and the Department of Agriculture signed a memorandum of understanding on 29 September to align environmental reviews for rural housing under another section of the same law.
Further out, Holland & Knight notes that the Act orders two reviews of the ban, one from the Government Accountability Office and one from HUD, each due no later than two years after the effective date and again by the ten-year mark. The first is to cover the availability and affordability of housing and how effective the prohibition is; the second, whether the definition of a large institutional investor should change.
Kooky, from Shaka
Kooky edits Agents Estate and builds Shaka, the payment router he made for real estate professionals. One payment comes in, and every agent, agency and party in the deal receives their signed share on closing date.
